An Analysis on the Impact of Commodity Prices and Exchange Rates on the Price of Bitcoin
Dr. Alicemani*, Likithakariappa P.
Department of Commerce, Christ University, Bangalore-560029
*Corresponding Author E-mail: likithakariappa412@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Bitcoin is the first decentralized cryptocurrency to be traded. There has been drastic increase in the price of bitcoin since 2013. Granger Causality analysis has been carried out to examine whether the price of commodities and the exchange rates helps in predicting the future price of bitcoin. For this study, the price of bitcoin, commodity prices and exchange rates have been considered from Jan 2103–Sep 2017.After the analysis it can be concluded that the price of commodities and the exchange rates does not help in predicting the future price of bitcoin. The past data of the price of bitcoin helps in predicting the future price of copper and British pound exchange rate with that of U.S dollars.Using Regression analysis, it can be determined that when the price increases by 0.0084 dollars there is one unit increase in the volume of transaction .Using variance analysis it can be observed that the price of bitcoin is more volatile compared to the price of commodities and the exchange rates.
KEYWORDS: Bitcoin price, commodity price, Granger Causality, Exchange rate, regression analysis, bitcoin exchange.
INTRODUCTION:
During the medieval times, gold, silver and copper coins were used as the mode of currency for trading purposes. Due to the passage of times, it shifted to paper money, plastic cards, and digital wallets now to bitcoin.This shift in the mode of currency for trading was to reduce the cost of transaction and avoid the risk of physical money. Bitcoin has brought a revolution in the field of cryptocurrency as it is the first cryptocurrency to be traded and used. It is a virtual currency, which is controlled by its developer, Satoshi Nakamato. It was introduced in the year 2009.
Bitcoin is a virtual currency or commodity which does not have a central authority or a bank as the transaction takes place directly between the users.
The number of bitcoins in circulation is limited to 21 million. All the transactions that take place in bitcoin are transparent as it is recorded in open ledger called as ‘’Blockchain”. Currently bitcoin is being regulated by commodity future trading commission (CFTC) but it is not confirmed if CFTC will permanently take up the responsibility of regulating bitcoins.
How to get bitcoins? Bitcoin can be earned by exchanging the fiat currency with bitcoins in various bitcoin exchanges. Bitcoin ATMs was introduced in the year 2016.
This ATM machine empowers both purchase of bitcoin and also reclamation of bitcoin for money. It can be earned by accepting payments in bitcoins and through mining process. Mining is an attempt to verify whether the sender is the real proprietor and has not sent to numerous clients. There is a fixed reward for mining.In the year 2010 it was 50 bitcoins per block, 2014 -25 bitcoins and now it is decreased to 12.5 bitcoins. The reward is halved every four years. The price of bitcoin in the year 2011 was 5 dollarsand currently in the year 2017, the price is approximately 4000 dollars.There has been a drastic increase in the price of bitcoin since 2013. Therefore, this study has been conducted to examine if there is a relationship between bitcoin price with that of the commodity price and the exchange rates.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
(Lio, 2016)Is trying to find out if bitcoin has a systematic risk by using CAPM model and what is the proportionof bitcoin that must be included in the investment portfolio by using mean variance portfolio. His findings show that bitcoin does not have a systematic risk and the proportion of bitcoin that must be included in the investment portfolio is 4.4% to 21.5%.
The author studies the determinants of bitcoin price in the long run and short run using ARDL model ,granger causality and concludes that in the long run volume of transaction positively influence the price of bitcoin . Gold price and financial stress index have negative impact on the price of bitcoin.
(Li, 2016) use Granger Causality test to test the efficient market hypothesis of bitcoin return by examining the relationship between social media information and the bitcoin returns .social media information is collected from twitter which contains more than 1,30,000 bitcoins related tweets. He concludes that bitcoin return in short run is affected by market sentiment information.
(woo, Gordon, and laralov, 2013) Examines the relationship between the volume of transactions in all bitcoin exchanges and the price of bitcoin and concludes that the correlation between the volume of all bitcoin exchange in China and the price of bitcoin is high and rising.
(Hill, 2016) Study the advantages and drawbacks of bitcoin. He states that after the price surge to $1000 on December 2013 there is a billion dollar increase in venture capital funding in bitcoin payment process, mining operation and bitcoin exchanges.
(Marse, 2015) Talks about coming up with a regulatory authority for bitcoin to avoid malpractices, black marketing and money laundering. Currently CFTC regulates bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The dilemma is if CFTC will permanently take up the in charge to regulate the bitcoin, Will It regulate it has a foreign exchange transaction or has a commodity?
(Negurita, 2014) Is of the opinion that the “occurrence of bitcoin is natural” because it was introduced to decrease the cost of printing bank notes. He explains about the five risks that are associated with bitcoin, i.e. difficulty in determining the intrinsic value, unidentifiable, high inflation, illicit activity and high volatility.
(Turpin, 2014) explains in a very simple manner about the private and public key used in bitcoin transactions i.e. public key is the street address and private key is the door. It was advised that the government, instead of discouraging the usage of bitcoin, must come up with a regulatory authority, to strengthen the virtual currency industry.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To verify whether the price of bitcoin is caused by the price of the commodities
2. To examine the causal relationship of price of bitcoin with that of exchange rates.
3. To analyse the impact of volume of transactions on the price of bitcoin.
4. To compare the degree of volatility among the bitcoin prices, the exchange rates and the commodity prices.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
For this study, data of prices of bitcoin, commodities and the exchange rates were considered. The commodities used for the study are gold, crude oil, natural gas, silver and copper because they come under the most traded commodity.
(Patterson, 2017) Exchange rate between US dollars with that of the Euro, British pound, Japanese Yen and Chinese Yen renminbi are considered on the grounds that bitcoin is exceptionally exchanged with these currencies. The duration from1 January 2012 to 31 September 2017 was considered because the price of bitcoin started gaining importance during this period. The data regarding price of bitcoin, commodity price and exchange rates are obtained from investing.com. The country that has been chosen for the analysis is the United States. Regression has been used to find the impact of the volume of transaction on the price of bitcoin.Granger causality is a statistical tool that is used to find if x causes y or y causes x i.e. if the past value of x is useful to determine the future value of y and vice versa(Foreste, 2007).
Granger causality test has been employed to check whether the price of bitcoin is caused by the price of commodities and the exchange rates. Variance analysis had been done to find out the volatility of bitcoin prices, commodity price and exchange rates and unit root test is employed to check the stationarity of the data.
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
UNIT ROOT TEST:
Before testing regression and Granger causality, assurance of stationarity should be tested. Unit root test is used to determine the stationarity of the data. The table below shows the results of unit root test of each variable, through which we can obtain the level at which the data is stationery and the t-statistic value of the data.Bitcoin price is stationery at second difference and the other variables are required to take thefirst difference to become stationery.
Table 1: unit root test of commodity price and exchange rates
|
PARTICULARS |
DIFFRENCE |
T-STATISTIC |
STATIONARY STATUS |
|
Bitcoin price |
Level 2nd difference |
-9.9819 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Copper price |
Level 1st difference |
-4.6904 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Crude oil price |
Level 1st difference |
-6.7009 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Natural gas price |
Level 1st difference |
-8.8019 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Gold price |
Level 1st difference |
-7.9946 |
Non stationery Stationery |
|
Silver price |
Level 1st difference |
-8.0547 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Euro |
Level 1st difference |
-8.2589 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
GBP |
Level 1st difference |
-7.8950 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
JPY |
Level 1st difference |
-7.5510 |
Non stationary Stationery |
|
Renminbi |
Level 1st difference |
-6.2927 |
Non stationary Stationery |
Before testing regression and Granger causality, assurance of stationarity should be tested. Unit root test is used to determine the stationarity of the data. The table above shows the results of unit root test of each variable, through which we can obtain the level at which the data is stationery and the t- statistic value of the data. Bitcoin price is stationery at second difference and the other variables are required to take thefirst difference to become stationery.
Table 2: Granger causality test between the price of bitcoin and price of commodities
|
Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Date: 09/23/17 Time 12:38 Sample: 2012M012017M08 Lags: 2 |
|||
|
Null Hypothesis: |
Obs |
F-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
COPPER_PRICE does not Granger Cause BITCOIN_PRICE BITCOIN_PRICE does not Granger Cause COPPER_PRICE |
66 |
0.60612 4.30020 |
0.5487 0.0179 |
|
CRUDE_OIL_PRICE does not Granger Cause BITCOIN_PRICE BITCOIN_PRICE does not Granger Cause CRUDE_OIL_PRICE |
66 |
0.06279 0.17102 |
0.9392 0.8432 |
|
NATURAL_PRICE does not Granger Cause BITCOIN_PRICE BITCOIN_PRICE does not Granger Cause NATURAL_PRICE |
66 |
1.01501 0.02123 |
0.3684 0.9790 |
|
GOLD_PRICE does not Granger Cause BITCOIN_PRICE BITCOIN_PRICE does not Granger Cause GOLD_PRICE |
66 |
1.28177 0.58907 |
0.2849 0.5580 |
|
SILVER_PRICE does not Granger Cause BITCOIN_PRICE BITCOIN_PRICE does not Granger Cause SILVER_PRICE |
66 |
0.97426 0.04279 |
0.3833 0.9581 |
After testing the stationarity, an attempt to verify whether there is a causalrelationship between the price of bitcoin and price of commodities has been made. The price of 5 most tradedcommoditiesi.e. gold, copper, natural gas, crude oil and Silver are considered as the indicator of commodity price. The table above explains that there is no positive causal relationship between the price of bitcoin and the price of commodities except copper price. This indicates that the past value of the price of commodities cannot be used to predict the future price of bitcoin but the Past value of Bitcoin price helps in predicting the future price of copper. The null hypothesis that is non stationery is rejected at 5% confidence level.
Table 3: Granger causality test between the price of bitcoin and the exchange rates
|
Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Date: 09/21/17 Time 15:05 Sample: 2012M012017M08 Lags: 1 |
|||
|
Null Hypothesis: |
Obs |
F-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
EURO does not Granger Cause BITCOINPRICE BITCOINPRICE does not Granger Cause COPPERPRICE |
67 |
0.00307 1.27361 |
0.9560 0.2633 |
|
GBP does not Granger Cause BITCOINPRICE BITCOINPRICE does not Granger Cause GBP |
67 |
0.63270 6.55397 |
0.4293 0.0128 |
|
JPY does not Granger Cause BITCOINPRICE BITCOINPRICE does not Granger Cause JPY |
67 |
0.86614 0.06418 |
0.3555 0.8008 |
|
YEN does not Granger Cause BITCOINPRICE BITCOINPRICE does not Granger Cause YEN |
67 |
5.00908 1.35621 |
0.0287 0.2485 |
The table above presents the Granger causality results of the price of bitcoin and the exchange rates with the U.S dollar. Exchange rates of four currencies i.e. renminbi, Euro, Japanese yenand British pound with which bitcoin are frequently exchanged are considered as the indicator of the exchange rate. It shows that there is no positive causal relationship between the price of bitcoin and the exchange rates except British pound. Therefore it can be concluded that the past data of exchange rates cannot be used to predict the future price of bitcoin but the past data of bitcoin prices can be used to predict the exchange rate of British Pound. The null hypothesis that is non stationery is rejected at 5% confidence level.
Table 4: Granger causality between the price and volume of bitcoin transaction
|
Pairwise Granger Causality Tests |
|||
|
Date: 08/19/17 Time: 16:14 |
|||
|
Sample: 1 2165 |
|
||
|
Lags: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Null Hypothesis: |
Obs |
F-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
VOLUME__BTC_ does not Granger Cause CLOSE |
2129 |
1.60746 |
0.2050 |
|
CLOSE does not Granger Cause VOLUME__BTC_ |
12.1543 |
0.0005 |
|
The above table shows the causal relationship between the closing price of bitcoin and the volume of transaction in bitcoin. Therefore it can be concluded that the closing price of bitcoin helps in predicting volume of transaction.
Table 5: Regression analysis between the price and volume of bitcoin transaction
|
Dependent variable : Close Methjod : Least Squares Date : 08/19/17 Time 1625 Sample (adjusted) : 12164 Induced Observations : 2143 after adjustments |
||||
|
Variable |
Coefficient |
Std. Error |
t-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
C VOLUME_BTC |
368.5903 0.008461 |
15.90160 0.001062 |
23.17945 7.968764 |
0.0000 0.0000 |
|
R-squared Adjusted R-squred S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log. likelihood F-statistic Pro(F-statistic) |
0.028805 0.028352 562.4452 6.77E+08 -16609.89 63.50120 0.000000 |
Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var Akaike info criterion Schwarz criterion Hannan-Quinn Criter. Durbin-Watson stat |
450.3403 570.5920 15.50340 15.50869 15.50533 0.024298 |
|
After analysing that there is causal relationship between the closing price of bitcoin and the volume of transaction. There is need to identify the impact of the closing price on the volume of transaction. It can be concluded that when the price increases by 0.008461 dollars there is 1 unit increase in the volume of transaction. The probability is less than 0.05 which implies that there is a significant relationship between the variables.R squared is 2.8%, It implies that 2.8% of the price variation is effected through the volume of transaction.
Table 6: Variance Analysis of the price of commodities
|
Variance calculation of the price of commodities |
|
|
Bitcoin price |
514798.2 |
|
Copper price |
0.276974 |
|
Gold price |
36661.48 |
|
Natural oil |
0.54788 |
|
Silver price |
35.22817 |
Table 7: Variance analysis of exchange rates
|
Variance calculation of the exchange rates |
|
|
Euro |
0.012319 |
|
British Pound |
0.001543 |
|
Japanese Yen |
189.1340 |
|
Renminbi |
0.02293 |
|
Bitcoin |
514798.2 |
From the above table it can be observed that the volatility of bitcoin is very high compared to the commodity price and Exchange rates. The huge price fluctuation in in the price of bitcoin provides a big opportunity and risk to the investors.
CONCLUSION:
From the study, it can be concluded that there is no causal relationship between the price of bitcoin and the price of commodities and exchange rates. The past data of the price of bitcoin and exchange rates cannot be used to predict the future price of bitcoin but the past data of the bitcoin price helps in predicting the future price of copper and the exchange rate of British pound. From the regression analysis it can be concluded when the price increases by 0.008461 dollars there is 1 unit increase in the volume of transaction. The volatility of the price of bitcoin is very high compared to the commodity price and the exchange rates. The investors can use this study in determining the future price of copper and the exchange rate of British pound using the past data of bitcoin price.
2. Hill, K. (2016). The future of money. 1-7.
3. Li, M. (2016). Emperical study on finance and labour economics. Pro Quest , 1- 130.
4. Lio, H. (2016). essay on digital currency. Pro Quest, 1-107.
5. Marse, v. Y. (2015). what is in store for bitcoin and crypto currency regulation . U.S international editions .
6. Negurita, O. (2014). Bitcoin- between legal and financial performance . Addleton Academic publisher, 242-248.
7. Patterson, C. c. (2017). Native Copper, Silver, and Gold Accessible to Early Metallurgists. American Antiquity, 286-321.
8. Turpin, J. B. (2014). Bitcoin- The economic case for a global virtual currency operating in unexplored legal framework. Indian Journal of Global Legal Studies.
9. Woo, D., Gordon, L., and laralov, v. (2013). Bitcoin: A first assement. Bank of america merril Lynch, 13 - 14.
Received on 10.11.2017 Modified on 15.12.2017
Accepted on 20.01.2018 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Asian Journal of Management. 2018; 9(1):427-431.
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763.2018.00065.3